Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Being John Malkovich (1999)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Directed by: Spike Jonze
Rated R

Starring:John Cusack (Craig Schwartz), Cameron Diaz (Lotte Schwartz), Catherine Keener (Maxine Lund), John Malkovich (John Horatio Malkovich)

Synopsis: Craig is a puppeteer trying to make ends meet by becoming a filing clerk. He comes across a secret passage while at work that leads him to a portal getting inside the head of John Malkovich for 15 minutes. He lets in his wife, Lotte, and beautiful co-worker, Maxine, on his discovery.

Review: This reminded me a lot of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. If you like quirky (I hate using that word), off-kilter movies, then this one's a keeper. Keener surprised me with her hotness since 40 Year-Old Virgin is the only movie I can think of her in at the moment. Cusack and Diaz both showed their acting skills by playing a convincing dowdy couple. Who takes the cake is Malkovich and his brilliance for being so out there.

Verdict: B

Monday, March 30, 2009

Twilight (2008)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More



Directed by: Catherine Hardwicke
Rated PG-13

Starring: Kristen Stewart (Bella Swan), Robert Pattinson (Edward Cullen), Billy Burke (Charlie Swan), Ashley Greene (Alice Cullen), Nikki Reed (Rosalie Hal), Jackson Rathbone (Jasper Hale), Kellan Lutz (Emmett Cullen), Peter Facinelli (Dr. Carlisle Cullen), Cam Gigandet, (James), Taylor Lautner (Jacob Black)

Synopsis: Based on the novel, Bella moves to Oregon and falls for a hot vampire, Edward.

Review: My dear friend Mal wrote about this a while back (read her great review here). Seeing it this weekend with some friends, I wish I finished the book instead of my copy collecting dust next to my bed (I'm still on page twenty-something). There are two elements I liked - the cinematography and the sexual tension. The blue tones and the vivid pop-out colors (red and green) were mesmerizing and made me want to wear black more. The sexual tension between Stewart and Pattinson was off the charts and made me question their age-portrayal (they're supposed to be 16 and 17?!). Hardwicke did a great job getting the tone right, but I'm going to ask you to read Mal's review on how close it comes to the book. There were a few moments of awkward silence, but overall decent and I recommend this for anyone who's interested.

Verdict: B

Made of Honor (2008)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Directed by: Paul Weiland
Rated PG-13

Starring: Patrick Dempsey (Tom Bailey), Michelle Monaghan (Hannah), Kevin McKidd (Colin McMurray), Kadeem Hardison (Felix), Sydney Pollack (Tom Bailey Sr.)

Synopsis: Tom realizes he's in love with his best friend Hannah while she's on a trip to Scotland. She comes back with a fiance and asks him to be her maid-of-honor while he tries to stop the wedding.

Review: This was one of the corniest rom-coms ever, but I liked it. I did have a deja vu to My Best Friend's Wedding, but making the guy be the one to chase the girl made me check it out on Instant Netflix. I'm not sure if I would have rented it at a video store, but I'm definitely glad I checked it out. One of the best characteristics of the movie is even though it's predictable is the dialog. McKidd and Monaghan made it work because they're not typecast in these roles (I kept thinking about McKidd's "Tommy" in Trainspotting). Even though Dempsey is hyped up, his performance was decent and did a good job by getting into the character. I was surprised to see "Dwayne" from Different World (Hardison) still acting, and bummed Pollack's last role was this movie. Regardless, I recommend this if you happen to see it on cable or if you have the option to rent multiple movies on Netflix.

Verdict: C

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Perfume: The Story of a Murderer (2006)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Directed by: Tom Tykwer
Rated R


Starring: Ben Whishaw (Jean-Baptiste Grenouille), Dustin Hoffman (Giuseppe Baldini), Alan Rickman (Richis), Rachel Hurd-Wood (Laura), John Hurt (Narrator)


Synopsis: Jean-Baptiste is a young man blessed with an intimidating sense of smell. He uses his gift by creating a perfume that features the scent of a woman- literally.


Review: I've seemed to strike it rich again by watching another beautiful movie. It's strange to think I would use the word "beautiful" when the story revolve around a murderer. What I first fell in love with is the camera's close-ups when Jean-Baptiste smells something he notices. In particular, he becomes infatuated with yellow plums and follows the basket of plums (and the girl who's carrying them) in a puppy dog/zombie fashion. Another aspect I liked is the impact Jean-Baptiste has on people who profit from him. It's done in a way that is satisfying and brings closure. Rickman is spectacular as always and I couldn't take my eyes off of Hurd-Wood - she's stunning! I must warn you of the ending because it's very strange and a little "out there."

Verdict: B-

Igby Goes Down (2002)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Written and directed by: Burr Steers
Rated R

Starring:Kieran Culkin (Igby), Claire Danes (Sookie), Jeff Goldblum (D.H.), Jared Harris (Russel), Amanda Peet (Rachel), Ryan Phillippe (Oliver), Bill Pullman (Jason), Susan Sarandon (Mimi Slocumb)

Synopsis: Dealing with family dysfunction, Igby seeks out the meaning of life.

Review: Hearing about this from the "intellectual crowd" back in the day on how great this movie is, I completely disagree after seeing it this past weekend. The act of "questioning authority" in a 400 Blows fashion by the title character hiding out in a friend's place smoking his life away and thinking you have it all figured out seems to be what made the smart "hotshots" think it was so cool. But if they were so "smart," why didn't they go for the gold and see The 400 Blows?

Unfortunately for Steers, his spin on the Antoine Doinel figure is more like a dumbed-down version of Zach Braff's "Andrew" from Garden State (not a compliment), who got their character inspiration from Dustin Hoffman's iconic "Benjamin Braddock" in The Graduate - follow me? In other words, the characters were far from being developed and needed to do so since Igby is a character study. No one was completely characterized except for Peet's "Rachel," who was in fact the most interesting character in the whole film! Everyone else (including "Igby") was far from leaving the audience an ambiguous idea of who the characters really and went straight to being underdeveloped and boring even though they did a terrific performance.

So to all of the children "coming of age" and "growing up," if your friends tell you to see this movie because it will "change your life," tell them you know better and watch French New Wave and Hollywood Renaissance films instead of that garbage. That will make them be quiet and look up "French New Wave" on Wikipedia.

Verdict: D

Friday, March 20, 2009

Watchmen (2009)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


This is from a guest writer and happens to be my intelligent, handsome boyfriend, Chris. Enjoy!

I’m not a graphic novel fan by any means. I have nothing against them, I just haven’t read enough of them or have been interested in them enough to say I’m in to them. However, a couple of years ago I read that The Watchmen made Time Magazine’s "Top 100 Novels of the Century", and I felt that that alone made it worth checking out. So I did, and I was completely blown away. I read a several more graphic novels after that, but I never found one that came close (with the notable exception of Jimmy Corrigan: Smartest Kid on Earth) to the depth that The Watchmen had. All that to say that the novel, to me at least, defines another level of greatness for its genre; that’s why I went in to the movie adaption with low expectations, because it would be very difficult to execute a translation to another genre. It could only go south of perfection, right?

Unfortunately, my expectations weren’t low enough.

In retrospect, had I known who Zack Snyder was before I went in, I think I probably could have spared myself the surprise of feeling like I had just watched someone jack off on the Mona Lisa.

Visually, I thought the translation was as good as it ever could have been. The characters looked exactly like the novel’s, and it seemed to me that if you were to look at each scene frame-by-frame, for every one you’d find an almost exact replica of the novel’s still representation. The cinematography is fantastic. When a pane of glass is shattered, you can see each shard fracture again and again in slow motion, and then stopped and rotated to show a top-down perspective of a character’s spectacular free-fall demise. Within each scene, each shadow, splatter of blood, teardrop, camera angle, and transition seemed to be meticulously detailed, and was truly thrilling to watch.

So it looked pretty spectacular when Zach Snyder jizzed on the Mona Lisa, I guess. But that doesn’t make it right.

What made the novel great, to me, was that within one story, so many themes are wrapped up and presented with such clarity and profundity that anyone who gave it a serious read would have to admit that it deserves to be considered serious literature. It was what The Watchmen said about the human condition as it posed serious philosophical questions asked by men and women in spandex, and how it acknowledged the absurdity of that in the dialog between characters that made you lose yourself in the world of The Watchmen.

None of that was presented very thoroughly in the movie. It seemed like those things were eclipsed by fast action, gore, and flashy elements in the cinematography. And maybe that’s exactly what I should have expected from Snyder. After all, I’m sure those things will sell movie tickets just fine.

It’s a very difficult to transpose art between mediums and still retain the essential aura of the original, which is why I had reservations before watching The Watchmen in theaters. But I don’t believe that that fact excuses any failure to carry the original’s greatness. Nor do I believe that it’s impossible to succeed in equaling (or even exceeding) the original medium’s depth. Often, however, transposing the work of art to a new medium means that the new medium will have to fundamentally alter elements of the original medium, and the question is whether it can achieve this with the effect of presenting the art from a new perspective we couldn’t see in the original, or if it simply attempts to photocopy the old medium onto the new. The latter, in my opinion, is like someone attempting to plaster an oil-painting onto some stone, instead of creating a new perspective by chiseling away from another angle.

In many ways, I think this movie’s creator attempted to plaster an oil-painting onto stone. Except that it wasn’t the visual elements that weren’t endowed with that new perspective, it was the underlying depth that the book achieved that was left alone or absent in the movie. And I do think it would have absolutely been possible, albeit very difficult, to do that, only there was probably very little motivation to concentrate on the profound elements when the flashier ones are going to be selling tickets.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Nine the Musical movie update (part 32)

A new image for this poop has hit the web. If the photo had an IQ, it dropped 10 points when Kate Hudson was spotted. See the image here.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Madea Goes to Jail (2009)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Read and comment here. Enjoy!

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008)

MovieWeb - Movie Photos, Videos & More


Directed by: Woody Allen
Rated PG-13

Starring: Christopher Evan Welch (Narrator), Rebecca Hall (Vicky), Scarlett Johansson (Cristina), Javier Bardem (Juan Antonio Gonzalo), Penélope Cruz (Maria Elena), Chris Messina (Doug), Patricia Clarkson (Judy Nash)

Synopsis: Two American friends, Vicky and Cristina, take a summer holiday to Barcelona, Spain. There they meet an attractive artist, Juan Antonio, who is interested in both of them and vice versa. However, his ex-wife, Maria Elena, is about to come back into his life and intervene.

Review: This was a breath of fresh air after watching his last film, Cassandra's Dream, and rekindled the excitement when I first saw Match Point. I'm not sure what Allen's inspiration has been for the past few years, but these new found comedies and dramas are absolutely delightful. Cruz and Bardem steal the show between Cruz's nuttiness and Bardem's sexiness. Johansson was good along the lines of Scoop, not brilliant like Match Point. Clarkson played a good supporting role, but I never realized how old she was until now. One thing to look at are the textures of their clothes. They're very earthy and linen, not crisp like Match Point. Okay, I'll stifle before I compare it to Match Point again. Instead, I'll recommend this for anyone who's in the mood for something free spirited. (Please be gentle to the "documentary" narrator. He means well and you don't hear him that much.) I'll warn you ahead of time to beware of wanting to go to Spain because the scenery is gorgeous!

Verdict: B

La Belle et la Bête (1946)

Written and Directed by: Jean Cocteau
French with subtitles

Starring: Jean Marais (La Bête (The Beast)/The Prince/Avenant), Josette Day (Belle), Mila Parély (Félicie), Nane Germon (Adélaïde), Michel Auclair (Ludovic), Raoul Marco (The Usurer), Marcel André (Belle's Father)

Synopsis: Cocteau's stunning adaptation of Jeanne-Marie Le Prince de Beaumont's fairy tale, "Beauty and the Beast."

Review: I've seen three versions of this movie- the Disney adaptation, the Faerie Tale Theatre adaptation and this one. Even though I loved the Disney version as a child, Cocteau's adaptation is absolutely jaw-dropping. The only thing I wished at times was a little tint of color on bits of the film. Perhaps only on the gorgeous clothes, Belle's hair and the chandeliers that would make this even more of a dream. There really isn't much to say other than I felt like a little girl again dancing around in her Belle Halloween costume. I definitely recommend this if you grew up loving fairy tales. See a bit of it here.

Before I forget, check out the Phillip Glass opera version of the film. It's his original score to the film along with dubbed in singers to match the actors' dialogue. I didn't watch it all the way through since I want to watch another movie in Netflix, but I'm sure it's beautiful.

Verdict: A

Institute Benjamenta (1995)

Complete title: Institute Benjamenta, or This Dream People Call Human Life
Directed by: Stephen Quay and Timothy Quay
English with German (subtitled)

Starring: Mark Rylance (Jakob), Alice Krige (Lisa Benjamenta), Gottfried John (Herr Benjamenta), Daniel Smith (Kraus)

Synopsis: Jakob enrolls at Institute Benjamenta to become a servant run by a brother and sister, Lisa and Herr. Jakob becomes fascinated and/or infatuated with Jakob and vice versa.

Review: As hard as it is to find a copy of this, it is equally as bizarre. Looking at the stunning images, I look up to see when in the 1940s it was made. What I came to find out it was made in 1995! The Quay Brothers do a stunning job with the cinematography. As far as symbolism, pay attention to the deer images. What does that signify? Is it carnal lust being repressed by Lisa and her feelings towards Jakob? Or is it something minute like deer immersed in a their territory? Another aspect to pay attention to is the sense of smell. Smelling the chalk dust, between the cracks of the stairs, and the musk of a room are all very vivid in this movie. My favorite sequence is when Lisa blindfolds Jakob and takes him to an imaginary place. I can't find it online, but if you were to rent this, it's the best part of the movie. There is also a bizarre dance sequence of the servants (see here). If you're in the mood to see something beautiful and almost abstract, check this out.

Verdict: B-